The Foxy Armadillos use time and space to pick up the speed reading pace, displayed at 50% of viewport width.
May 2019 by V. R. Duin

SPEED READING VS DEEP READING

Roll, 'Dillos, roll.
Speed up our goal.
Slow takes a toll!

Learning about the different reading methods may help writers and readers understand how speed reading hurts comprehension and how deep reading helps learning.

Different Reading Methods

Beneath the Surface? Different reading applications call for different reading methods. The sights and sounds entering human space in the digital era include books, audio books, videos and informative Web content.


Open Water? Writers must weigh content against the trending advantages and expectations for tech speed. To do otherwise with communications, applications or materials may alienate prospective audiences.


The Seedy Side? Frustrating bounce rates measure loss of site navigators after partial views of a page. Content may repel digital-age human traffic. Browsers react to repetitiveness by triggering an alert to stop the script.


Palace Intrigue? People catch ideas leaping at them. Speed readers get annoyed with text mindlessly crawling across space and time. Moore's law correctly predicted processor power would double every two years.


Hill Crop? Writers must understand online formats. Web surfers expect defined text areas for titles, headings and paragraphs. They follow different fonts, sizes, styles, borders or colors to extract highlights.

Speed Reading Hurts Comprehension

Ticket to Ride? Consumers expect greater velocity and automation. Computers, cellphones, vehicles and appliances interact with users in ever-faster new ways. Leafing through pages lags behind voice and virtual reality.


Sour Orange? Few modern readers endure long or convoluted texts. Viewers quickly leave online content offering no immediate information or structure against which to reflect or build strength.


A Mighty Force? The need for speed is applied to most visual materials. Speed-building applications require practice. Haste is contrary to acquiring vocabulary, researching or making sense of content.


Mapped Out? Computerized speed-accelerating applications are based on screen presentations. An audience may be attracted by the introduction of familiar tech formats into printed materials. These may accelerate skimming.


Hot Seat? There is no time to waste. Too many places to go, too many things to do and too little time are forcing people to rush through information. Little of what they view may register for later recall.


Sweet and Low? Brief views deliver advantages. Someone may linger for understanding. While sifting through news headlines, social media posts or surfing the Web, a glance shows if material is of interest or relevance.

Deep Reading Helps Learning

High Fidelity? Deep reading facilitates learning. It is useful for slow-pace presentations requiring study or full concentration to cement understanding. Readers take time to absorb new information.


Sweet Spot? Engaging with a book helps to connect new information with existing knowledge. Those who Pay Reading Forward provide fuel for introspection, focus and opportunity to reach conclusions.


Breaking the Rules? Machines are programmed to read and index content, quickly and fully. Search engines do data gathering, scrutinizing and selection work. Information risks getting lost with shallow inspections.


Inside Knowledge? People must experiment for themselves. Few individuals are likely to tolerate slogging through tedious, slow presentations or unwanted audio, video or digital programs splashed into personal space.


Magical? Humans are not programmed with machine hypervelocity or data. Reading is limited by eye movement and cognitive ability. Average reading rates offer quicker gains in knowledge than hearing that information.